|
What is biodiesel? Biofuels Northern Ireland (UK) |
||
|
Tailpipe Emissions The tailpipe emissions from biodiesel are far more people-friendly than those from petrodiesel. They are neither carcinogenic nor mutagenic and cause far less bronchial irritation. EPA confirms that - Carbon monoxide is reduced by 47%. Because biodiesel is an oxygenated fuel, much of the harmful carbon monoxide is converted to the dioxide. Carbon dioxide is increased by 2%. This doesn’t matter – the plants from which the oil came absorbed the carbon dioxide from the atmosphere when growing. This is carbon recycling. Particulates are reduced by 48%. Total unburned hydrocarbons by 67% This figure may be improved even further by the use of particulate traps. A reduction of 41% was achieved in Belfast during trials with a 22 year old Translink passenger bus after less than 50 miles travelled. NOx emissions may be increased by up to 10%. This is using 100% biodiesel in a standard diesel engine without a catalytic converter fitted. A reduction of 4% may be achieved when a catalytic converter is fitted and by retarding the fuel injection timing by 2 or 3 degrees. Using a mix of biodiesel and petrodiesel results in proportionately decreased NOx emissions. SOx emissions are reduced 100%. Biodiesel does not contain sulphur other than by trace contamination,. Lifecycle Emissions The main reason why the UK is so far behind other EU member states is an incorrect report published in 1995 which stated that the use of biodiesel would save only 60% of carbon dioxide greenhouse gas emissions. This was contrary to all other reports published world-wide, but it has taken many years to overcome government resistance. No two lifecycle studies have produced the same results, due to the fact that there are so many variables in the crop production equation. The US Environmental Protection Agency conclusion was that a 78% carbon emissions reduction, versus petrodiesel, is achievable. www.epa.gov/otaq/models/biodsl.htm Production of biodiesel from used cooking oils reduces carbon emissions by 90% (DTI). Every tonne of biodiesel used saves over 3 tonnes of carbon dioxide emissions, thereby reducing global warming. |
"Cleaner Fuels"
(for ever and ever, amen)
http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/chris.garnett/biodiesel/biodiesel_manual.htm Biodiesel Elsewhere
Biodiesel was approved by the US Congress for general use on 22 June 2000 following exhaustive Tier 1 & 2 trials being carried out by the Environmental Protection Agency. It is the only fuel to have been subjected to these trials. The maximum potential in the UK for recycled oil production under the new tax regime will be 100,000 tonnes. This is only 1.5% of the petrodiesel fuel used in the UK, or 0.3% of the total transport fuels.
Other biofuels - your engine may be at risk You may come across alternative organic fuels based on vegetable oils or tallows that are not chemically refined to produce the mono alkyl esters known generically as "biodiesel". Unfortunately, they may be unapproved mixtures of recovered oils, petrol, paint thinners or other modifiers - like the "golden elixir" poured through a J-cloth that "astonished" Mr Jeremy Clarkson on the BBC programme Top Gear! According to researchers at the University of Idaho - Results of these studies indicated that potential hazards such as stuck piston rings ("gumming up"), carbon build-up on injectors, fuel system failure and lubricating oil contamination (polymerisation) existed when vegetable oils were used as alternative fuels. ** Whilst we would support any valid attempt to produce sustainable transport fuels, it must be stressed that such fuels have not undergone the literally hundreds of successful laboratory tests and long-term vehicle trials that biodiesel has. This is why members of the ABI(UK) make mono alkyl esters and do not try to take short cuts. Caveat emptor - it is your engine (even if it is a battered old Volvo 740!) Reports have been received from UK sources that indicate the commercial exploitation of such mixtures and the subsequent failure of a number of engines. Trading Standards Officers have been alerted that such fuels may not be suitable when sold for use in unmodified modern direct injection diesel engined vehicles. Amended HMR&C policy has confirmed that the producers of such fuels must pay the Substitute Fuels rate of excise duty - the same as for ULSD. **Footnote - In fact, the use of straight vegetable oil (SVO) is well-proven and animal tallows have also been used successfully. Both of these fuels, however, require specialised vehicle conversion and tailpipe emissions of particulates (smoke) can be twice that of ULSD - four times the emissions of biodiesel . One responsible source of UK SVO information is www.vegoilmotoring.com |
|